top of page

Remote learning support

Public·5 members

After Effects CC 2019 Essential Training €?

This course will teach you the basics of the Audition CC. Not only that, but you will also learn the capabilities of this awesome software. With the help of your instructor, you will be able to professionally edit and mix audio with Audition CC 2019. In regards to this, you will quickly go through several fundamental audio production terms. Later on, all of the knowledge will help you to know how to import different kinds of media properly, which is very essential.

After Effects CC 2019 Essential Training –

Spelling and grammatical errors throughout manuscript- suggest re-read of manuscript from someone external to the research team. For example in the abstract, starting a sentence with PG is not recommended. Inconsistency of word "program" and "programmes" and "elderly" and "older" womenLine 46, 98, 100,: reword sentence Line 51: New sentence "Thus..."Line 53; unsure what the .. are for? Line 54, 259, 312, 326: insert reference Line 60; provide more than the one reference you have as you included "studies" Line 89: provide ethics numberLine 107: include the number of sessions with % Throughout the manuscript, you need to be consistent on what one of the groups is, muscular group or traditional resistance training? very confusing? Line 234: included results to strengthen your statement in the discussion Line 257; two or three? you include three studies after this sentence, recheck? You should also include more detail about these studies age bracket and whether this related to females or both genders included int he results for the comparison of the results you have for this manuscript. Inconsistency of referencing formatting Figure 1: consistency of either 'intervention" or "group" for the manuscript. Include what ITT stands for Curious as to why participants discontinued intervention for Pilates and muscular intervention All tables: rephrase titles as they should stand without the manuscript. Table 1: include weeks 1-2 in tableTable 2-7: include key legend of words missing eg. SD missing what * for p-values representTable 4 -5: what does * mean?

The main finding of the study was the interaction effect (group vs. time) for isometric hip extension (Pilates group showed greater peak torque than the control group). No additional effects were observed. In an intragroup analysis, training protocols showed moderate/large effects in isometric and isokinetic peak torque. In order to improve the understanding, I suggest that the authors present results of the trunk and hip isometric peak torques separately (lines 212 to 216). Additionally, the content of tables 6 and 7 can be presented together (just one table).In a general analysis, the effects of Pilates training was great for isometric peak torque (both trunk and hip, independently of the movement direction), while the effects of muscular resistance training were great for isokinetic peak torque (both hip flexion and extension, independently of the angular velocity). Pilates training presented insignificant/small effects in isokinetic hip extension and flexion peak torque (independently of angular velocity). As groups were different at baseline for age and TUG performance, authors must make themselves clear about the adjustment of these differences in the ANCOVA (Did age is set as covariable for all analysis? Did TUG was set as covariable, at least for the mobility analysis?)In relation to secondary outcomes, only mobility improved after exercise training (small effects for Pilates and medium effects for muscular resistance). No changes were observed for static balance.The discussion section must be improved. Besides some misconceptions (example, in line 313 about the muscular resistance training used being considered as a multicomponent training by the authors), evidence of the importance of trunk and hip strength for balance and functional capacity need to be explored. Also, isometric contraction is very common in Pilates exercises and this must be pointed in the discussion. Even being a secondary outcome, is important to explain the absence of results in the static balance after the exercise training protocols studied.I recommend that the author rewrite the conclusion. I disagree with the statement that Pilates and muscular resistance exercise training brought similar results to strength variables analyzed. As described above, Pilates presented insignificant/small effects for isokinetic hip extension peak torque, while the effect of muscular resistance on isokinetic hip peak torques was medium/large. In addition, there are no data in the manuscript that support Pilates contribution to a reduced risk of falling and dying in older women.

Master Gardeners might recall attending the Sustainable Landscape Train the Trainer series two years ago. The Statewide Master Gardener program surveyed the people who were subsequently trained by Master Gardeners and we found some wonderful things! For example, 77% of the people who did not compost at the time of training indicated that they had started composting after three months! That is a significant change in their behavior that definitely leads to a more sustainable California. In addition to composting, over 40% more people began leaving portions of their gardens undisturbed for wildlife, 20% of those surveyed began using better irrigation techniques, and just over 10% planted drought tolerant plants. These examples are just a handful of the practices that were influenced by the Sustainable Landscape classes.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of subjects declared to know how to perform CPR, 62% knew the correct chest compression/ventilation ratio but only one in four knew the CC quality standards. Eighty-eight percent knew what an automated external defibrillator (AED) was; willingness to use the device improved from 70% to 98% after training. Almost half of CCs were performed atan adequate rate. Men performed deeper compressions than women (56.1 4.03 mm vs. 52.17 5.51 mm, p = 0.007), but in both cases the mean value was within recommendations. Full chest recoil was better in women (72.2 32.8% vs. 45.4 32.9%, p = 0.009). All CCs were delivered with correct hand positions.


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...
bottom of page